🔗 Share this article

Opponents have charged Germany’s head of government, Friedrich Merz, of adopting what they call “harmful” discourse regarding migration, after he supported “extensive” deportations of people from cities – and asserted that parents of girls would support his viewpoint.

Defiant Stance

Friedrich Merz, who took office in May vowing to counter the growth of the far-right AfD party, on Monday chastised a reporter who questioned whether he intended to revise his strict statements on immigration from last week considering extensive condemnation, or express regret for them.

“It is unclear if you have children, and female children among them,” remarked to the reporter. “Consult your girls, I expect you’ll get a very direct answer. I have nothing to retract; on the contrary I reiterate: it is necessary to modify something.”

Opposition Backlash

The left-leaning opposition charged the chancellor of borrowing tactics from radical groups, whose claims that women and girls are being targeted by foreigners with sexual violence has become a international right-wing mantra.

Green party politician Ricarda Lang, accused Merz of having a condescending message for girls that failed to recognise their real policy priorities.

“It is possible ‘the daughters’ are also fed up with the chancellor showing concern about their rights and safety when he can leverage them to support his completely outdated policies?” she posted on the platform X.

Security Focus

The chancellor stated his primary concern was “security in common areas” and highlighted that only when it could be ensured “would the conventional political parties win back confidence”.

He received backlash recently for comments that opponents claimed suggested that variety itself was a problem in German cities: “Of course we continue to have this problem in the urban landscape, and that is why the interior minister is now striving to enable and carry out removals on a extensive basis,” commented during a tour to the state of Brandenburg adjacent to Berlin.

Bias Accusations

Clemens Rostock alleged that Merz of fueling discriminatory attitudes with his remark, which provoked limited rallies in multiple cities across Germany at the weekend.

“It’s dangerous when incumbent parties seek to label individuals as a problem due to their physical characteristics or background,” Rostock said.

Social Democrats MP Natalie Pawlik of the SPD, junior partners in the ruling coalition, said: “Migration should not be stigmatised with oversimplified or demagogic automatic responses – this divides society more deeply and eventually benefits the undesirable elements rather than promoting answers.”

Political Context

Merz’s CDU/CSU bloc recorded a disappointing 28.5 percent performance in the February general election compared to the anti-immigration, anti-Islam Alternative für Deutschland with its record 20.8 percent.

From that point, the far right party has matched with the CDU/CSU, exceeding their support in various opinion polls, during voter fears around immigration, criminal activity and economic slowdown.

Previous Positions

Friedrich Merz ascended to leadership of his organization vowing a firmer stance on migration than previous leader the former head of government, dismissing her “wir schaffen das” motto from the asylum seeker situation a previous decade and assigning her some responsibility for the growth of the far-right party.

He has fostered an occasionally increasingly popularist rhetoric than his predecessor, notoriously blaming “little pashas” for repeated property damage on New Year’s Eve and refugees for filling up dentist appointments at the detriment of nationals.

Electoral Preparations

Merz’s Christian Democrats convened on recent days to develop a strategy ahead of several local polls next year. the far-right party maintains significant advantages in several eastern states, nearing a historic 40 percent approval.

The chancellor maintained that his political group was in agreement in preventing partnership in government with the far-right party, a stance widely known as the “protection”.

Party Concerns

Nonetheless, the current opinion research has spooked some party supporters, prompting a handful of political figures and consultants to suggest in recently that the approach could be untenable and harmful in the future.

Those disagreeing contend that while the AfD established twelve years ago, which national intelligence agencies have labelled as far-right, is able to snipe from the sidelines without having to take the hard choices governing requires, it will gain from the governing party disadvantage plaguing many developed countries.

Research Findings

Scholars in the country have discovered that established political groups such as the Christian Democrats were increasingly allowing the extremist to determine priorities, unwittingly validating their ideas and spreading them to a greater extent.

Even though Merz resisted using the word “firewall” on the recent occasion, he maintained there were “fundamental differences” with the AfD which would make collaboration unfeasible.

“We accept this difficulty,” he said. “From now on further make it very clear and directly the far-right party’s beliefs. We will distance ourselves very clearly and very explicitly from them. {Above all